Opisz uroczystość zwiazaną z obchodami święta pańswowego
lub
Napisz recenzję filmu, książki lub sztuki teatralnej, któej bohaterem jest postać historyczna, która odegrałą ważną rolę w życiu religijnym lub politycznym swojego kraju
wypowiedź powinna zawierać od 200 do 250 słów bardzo proszę Was o pomoc i z góry dziękuje ;)
Kanashii
A true life story of Irena Sendler delights, enchants and inspires admiration, from the film, though ambitious, however, seem not fully reflect the times of the ghetto and the actual events that took place then and what made the character of Irena Sendler is today known and respected throughout the world.
Irena Sendler, a woman he can safely be called a heroic heroine, who had no resistance to oppose the Germans, and to save them from the murderous hands of Jewish children. It was she who preserved and exported from the ghetto children whose death was inevitable, but because of its nature, persistence and passion - it was not. She saved more than 2,000 babies that have perished in the Warsaw ghetto during World War II.
About her was to be a story that moves, fascinates, inspires admiration and respect for those who risked their lives to save someone else. And this is a film by John Kent Harrison, although some after leaving the theater feeling unsatisfied and disappointed. But you pour tons of blood on the screen, show aggression, brutality and human gallons of sweat mixed with the blood of slaughter, to make an impression on us? It seems that yes, he stimulates us stories of such films are mainly. But not this one, despite the fact that "Children of Irena Sendler" is a time of war, the ghetto and the persecution of Jewish children, the film Harrison's not going to show us the shambles that it really does not make anything and do not communicate. We see Irena Sendler, who has no doubt trying to save children from the hands of the enemy, we see a silent and devastating war, but insensitive and not raising an avalanche of human entrails thrown on the screen. We see children from acquiring fear the power that has them and a determination to kill the woman who does not submit to the Nazi zapędom innocent life. We see the pain and courage, emotions are intertwined with each other and which lead us to a moment release, induce us to reflect, think.
And what about the fact that cinema is sucks? What about the fact that there is no blood and the characters are predictable, or opportunistic heroic Poles, Jews were reconciled to their fate and bad Germans. What's that music landlady dies somewhere in the background and does not give power? And how much is that the movie scenes are boring, predictable, political and morally correct, that is to say that we do not do impressions? And whether it is important to us in the driving seat fancy tricks and special effects, which in this film is not? This is life. This is war. This is another attempt to save the existence and heroism of ordinary women, who today talking about what happened then does not speak nobly, no pride in what she did. She's glad she could.
Irena Sendler, a woman he can safely be called a heroic heroine, who had no resistance to oppose the Germans, and to save them from the murderous hands of Jewish children. It was she who preserved and exported from the ghetto children whose death was inevitable, but because of its nature, persistence and passion - it was not. She saved more than 2,000 babies that have perished in the Warsaw ghetto during World War II.
About her was to be a story that moves, fascinates, inspires admiration and respect for those who risked their lives to save someone else. And this is a film by John Kent Harrison, although some after leaving the theater feeling unsatisfied and disappointed. But you pour tons of blood on the screen, show aggression, brutality and human gallons of sweat mixed with the blood of slaughter, to make an impression on us? It seems that yes, he stimulates us stories of such films are mainly. But not this one, despite the fact that "Children of Irena Sendler" is a time of war, the ghetto and the persecution of Jewish children, the film Harrison's not going to show us the shambles that it really does not make anything and do not communicate. We see Irena Sendler, who has no doubt trying to save children from the hands of the enemy, we see a silent and devastating war, but insensitive and not raising an avalanche of human entrails thrown on the screen. We see children from acquiring fear the power that has them and a determination to kill the woman who does not submit to the Nazi zapędom innocent life. We see the pain and courage, emotions are intertwined with each other and which lead us to a moment release, induce us to reflect, think.
And what about the fact that cinema is sucks? What about the fact that there is no blood and the characters are predictable, or opportunistic heroic Poles, Jews were reconciled to their fate and bad Germans. What's that music landlady dies somewhere in the background and does not give power? And how much is that the movie scenes are boring, predictable, political and morally correct, that is to say that we do not do impressions? And whether it is important to us in the driving seat fancy tricks and special effects, which in this film is not? This is life. This is war. This is another attempt to save the existence and heroism of ordinary women, who today talking about what happened then does not speak nobly, no pride in what she did. She's glad she could.