Question

Films are better when you watch them in the cinema. why? /why not?

First part is always better than the sequel. Why?/ Why not?

Set books should be read not watched. Why?/Why not?

Special effect are this what makes people attrected to the cinema. Why?/Why not?

Films are better than books. Why?/Why not?

po 3 argumenty do każdego zdania muszę napisać ;(

nie wyrabiam już z wszystkim ;]

Answer 1

Films are better when you watch them in the cinema. why? /why not? yes, and not

Films are better when you watch them in the cinema, because in cinema there are the best special effects, better video and better voices. Films are better too when you watch in home, because it is free and in home we can watch filsm more comfortable. Films arent' better when you watch in the cinema, because in the cinema room, there are many people, who talking, eating and stand in the way.

 

First part is always better than the sequel - not.

First part isnt always better tahn the sequel because in the sequel an action is unfolding. First part is usually boring and in first part there is leading us into world of heroes. In sequel we can watch better playing actors than in first part.

 

Set books should be read not watched. I think not, because usually books are better than films. When we read books we can imagine the heroes and their world.

 

Special effect are this what makes people attrected to the cinema. yes and not

Yes because special effect they are much giving for us as well if the special effects are really good. Not because if special effects are not good we can enjoying actores. We usually come to cinema to enjoying the actores.

 

Films are better than books. yes. Films are better than books becacuse whe we;re reading books we can imagine hereos and their world. Books are always write than films.