mohon untuk di translate
A STORY TO BEGIN WITH:
In order to circumscribe the phenomenon of moral motivation, curcio (2008) uses a convincing story: it is friday evening. the soldiers want to leave for the weekend. the commander of the company discover that, after the exercise with live ammunition, three hand grenades are missing. a certain commander stops the weekend leave and orders a search for the missing weapons.
Other commanders disagree with this action. the commander, who chooses to retain the 300 soliders, albeit with all the problems of dissatifaction and grumbling, has-what we call- responsibility motivation. he is motivated to change the situation and to ensure that children should not be exposed to the danger of an explosion. the other commanders do not have responsibility motivation.
As curcio shows, however, most commanders are at the same stage of the DIT (Defining issues test) measure (See rest,1986), the same intelligence characteristics, similar social contexts, similar status in the military force, and even similar status in the private job carrier (Switzerland has no professional army but only a public militia army) etc.
thus, if the personality constraints are the same. yet action differs so fundamentally, responsibility motivation, or moral as a general construct is at stake. interviews elicit that: all people have motives for acting or not acting (cognitive disequilibrium): all have situational knowledge for accepting or denying its seriousness: all reflect about possible consequences (cognitive equilibrium gap) some do not see the action possibilities (seeing the action as impossible): some are denying the sense if necessity (no necessity for acting) some show the will to act against resistance, some try to overcome the fear (very high emotional fear or shame blocking the action) and some do or not use their moral identity concept to balance justice, care and truthfulness in this situation. furghermore, some even show no effort aimed at accomplishing the perceived goals (No volition)
A STORY TO BEGIN WITH:
In order to circumscribe the phenomenon of moral motivation, curcio (2008) uses a convincing story: it is friday evening. the soldiers want to leave for the weekend. the commander of the company discover that, after the exercise with live ammunition, three hand grenades are missing. a certain commander stops the weekend leave and orders a search for the missing weapons.
Other commanders disagree with this action. the commander, who chooses to retain the 300 soliders, albeit with all the problems of dissatifaction and grumbling, has-what we call- responsibility motivation. he is motivated to change the situation and to ensure that children should not be exposed to the danger of an explosion. the other commanders do not have responsibility motivation.
As curcio shows, however, most commanders are at the same stage of the DIT (Defining issues test) measure (See rest,1986), the same intelligence characteristics, similar social contexts, similar status in the military force, and even similar status in the private job carrier (Switzerland has no professional army but only a public militia army) etc.
thus, if the personality constraints are the same. yet action differs so fundamentally, responsibility motivation, or moral as a general construct is at stake. interviews elicit that: all people have motives for acting or not acting (cognitive disequilibrium): all have situational knowledge for accepting or denying its seriousness: all reflect about possible consequences (cognitive equilibrium gap) some do not see the action possibilities (seeing the action as impossible): some are denying the sense if necessity (no necessity for acting) some show the will to act against resistance, some try to overcome the fear (very high emotional fear or shame blocking the action) and some do or not use their moral identity concept to balance justice, care and truthfulness in this situation. furghermore, some even show no effort aimed at accomplishing the perceived goals (No volition)
Jawaban:
Untuk membatasi fenomena motivasi moral, Curcio (2008) menggunakan cerita yang meyakinkan: ini adalah malam Jumat. Para prajurit ingin pergi untuk akhir pekan. Komandan perusahaan menemukan bahwa, setelah latihan dengan amunisi hidup, tiga granat tangan hilang. Seorang komandan tertentu menghentikan cuti akhir pekan dan memerintahkan pencarian senjata yang hilang.
Komandan lain tidak setuju dengan tindakan ini. Komandan, yang memilih untuk menahan 300 prajurit, meskipun dengan semua masalah ketidakpuasan dan keluhan, memiliki apa yang kita sebut motivasi tanggung jawab. Dia termotivasi untuk mengubah situasi dan memastikan bahwa anak-anak tidak terpapar bahaya ledakan. Komandan lain tidak memiliki motivasi tanggung jawab.
Namun, seperti yang ditunjukkan oleh Curcio, sebagian besar komandan berada pada tahap yang sama dari ukuran DIT (Defining Issues Test) (Lihat Rest, 1986), karakteristik kecerdasan yang sama, konteks sosial yang serupa, status serupa dalam kekuatan militer, dan bahkan status serupa dalam karir pekerjaan swasta (Swiss tidak memiliki tentara profesional tetapi hanya tentara milisi publik) dll.
Jadi, jika kendala kepribadian sama. Namun tindakan berbeda begitu mendasar, motivasi tanggung jawab, atau moral sebagai konstruk umum dipertaruhkan. Wawancara mengungkapkan bahwa: semua orang memiliki motif untuk bertindak atau tidak bertindak (ketidakseimbangan kognitif): semua memiliki pengetahuan situasional untuk menerima atau menolak keseriusannya: semua merenungkan kemungkinan konsekuensi (kesenjangan keseimbangan kognitif) beberapa tidak melihat kemungkinan tindakan (melihat tindakan sebagai mustahil): beberapa menolak rasa jika keharusan (tidak ada keharusan untuk bertindak) beberapa menunjukkan kemauan untuk bertindak melawan perlawanan, beberapa mencoba mengatasi rasa takut (rasa takut atau malu emosional yang sangat tinggi yang menghalangi tindakan) dan beberapa menggunakan atau tidak menggunakan konsep identitas moral mereka untuk menyeimbangkan keadilan, perawatan dan kejujuran dalam situasi ini. Lebih lanjut lagi, beberapa bahkan tidak menunjukkan upaya yang ditujukan untuk mencapai tujuan yang dirasakan (Tidak ada volisi)