Graffiti cannot be considered a form of art since its basic difference from art is consent or permission Although some people consider graffiti to be one of many art forms, it is often considered vandalism for a variety of reasons.
Firstly, graffiti is considered to be unwanted and unpleasant damage to both public and
government properties. In modern times, almost all of the countries in the world consider the defacing
of public or government owned property with any type of graffiti to be an act of vandalism.
Such an act is not only a mutilation of property and an ugly thing, but it is also very expensive to remove. Secondly, graffiti scribblers often create their graffiti without the permission of the owner of the property. Although they claim what they have created appears to be artistic, taking something without the permission of the owner or other authority can be considered vandalism Thirdly, graffiti becomes a huge problem since it contaminates the environment of a locality. It is undeniably a plague for our modern cities since it leads to visual pollution. City
officials and councils have to spend huge sums in order to clean the ever-present graffiti on
the walls and fences, but the damage still always remains For example, the paint may not
match perfectly, or the area may become darker than usual, exposing the cover completely. Finally, graffiti is nothing more than an irresponsible and dangerous form of art that promotes gang activities and truancy. It becomes so offensive that it disturbs the local residents making it a concern for the entire community. Residents are concerned not only for their own safety, but also for the safety of their children, who must grow up in such a disturbing and troubled neighborhood Thus, we can see that there is nothing artistic about graffiti Graffiti is vandalism because it damages public or government-owned property, pollutes the environment. promotes gang activities and
truancy, and is created without the property owner's permission #NoNgasal #NoBHSalien
Graffiti cannot be considered a form of art since its basic difference from art is consent or permission Although some people consider graffiti to be one of many art forms, it is often considered vandalism for a variety of reasons.
3. to stop doing grafitti because it was vandalism
4. graffiti is considered to be unwanted and unpleasant damage to both public and
government properties.
5. it means grafitti could make some damage to bunch of property, ex: walls, building, etc.
Verified answer
1. Grafitti
2. Graffiti is Vandalism
Graffiti cannot be considered a form of art since its basic difference from art is consent or permission Although some people consider graffiti to be one of many art forms, it is often considered vandalism for a variety of reasons.
3. to stop doing grafitti because it was vandalism
4. graffiti is considered to be unwanted and unpleasant damage to both public and
government properties.
5. it means grafitti could make some damage to bunch of property, ex: walls, building, etc.