informacion en ingles sobre puntos a favor de la legalizacion de la cocaina en realidad me urge :(
deernosesp5lz35
1.- The war on drugs is financially unsustainable. This marker quantifies the spending in the war against drugs in the USA so far this year; specifically more than 40,000 million dollars per year. Do not forget that all these burdensome expenses are borne by the taxpayer through taxes. 2.- Let the courts be able to take care of the real crimes. I refer to real interference against the freedom and property of third parties such as theft, fraud, or physical aggression since the act of using drugs does not threaten the freedom or property of others. We usually complain about the collapse of justice. Let's not contribute to this by judging crimes where there are none. 3.- Other civil liberties would be protected In the so-called war on drugs, multiple civil liberties are thrown into the air on the road. Records, invasion of privacy, censorship and other associated prohibitions seem almost inevitable in an endless contest. Legalizing drugs seems an inescapable part of the restoration of many civil liberties that have been attacked. 4.- Drugs would be safer It has come to be considered that the overwhelming majority of deaths from drug use are due to the lack of standardized doses, something that would naturally make the market open. 5.- The spread of diseases such as HIV would be contained As D. R. Blackmon states in his book "Moral Deaths", the prohibition of drugs has contributed to the spread of HIV among intravenous drug users. Other diseases such as hepatitis also increase as a result of these drugs beyond any control of the legal market. Since drugs are prohibited, the sale of sterilized needles has been limited. Legalizing drugs, they would be safer and the sale of hygienic utensils would be freely allowed. The legalization of drugs in 2000 in Portugal has led to reduced HIV infection among drug users in this country to practically the European minimum. 6.- Organized crime would be eroded When an asset is declared illegal, who is typically responsible for distributing it and offering it? As should be obvious, then those experts in skipping the law. Prices, in addition to prohibited goods or products, rise dramatically, partly due to the high costs of operating outside the law. Thus, with the prohibition we attract the experts in skipping the law with the extra appeal of huge benefits. Legalizing drugs, any person respectful of law and order could attend the open market of these goods and products. As Friedman said, the illegalization stimulates the cartelization of the drug market since it is not subject to free competition. 7.- Police corruption would be reduced The illegalization of drugs generates exorbitant prices, which translate into very high benefits. Benefits that the law, through the prohibition, considers illegal. Police corruption is seriously aggravated in the current prohibitionist scenario, and with it the police themselves find an obstacle to more effectively combat assets that are impossible to eliminate in and of themselves. 8.- Many countries would be safer There are regions and countries like Colombia, Nicaragua or others where the prohibition of drugs has wreaked havoc to the point of claiming many lives by terrorist organizations. The legalization of drugs would stop feeding those mafias and armed terrorist groups. 9.- Its consumption would be reduced Although at first it might seem strange, the attractiveness effect that prohibition creates is in line with reality. For example, according to a study on drug addiction in Europe in 2009, the Dutch are among those who have the lowest rates of cannabis use despite being legalized in their country. 10.- Nature can not be prohibited Prohibiting substances that exist in nature is ridiculous in that they will not cease to exist. The only way to know how to coexist with these substances is to legalize them, in the same way that alcohol could be seen as harmful to health, but its prohibition only leads (and has led to) all the consequences mentioned. Just as we know how to coexist with alcohol, we must know how to live with any other substance.
This marker quantifies the spending in the war against drugs in the USA so far this year; specifically more than 40,000 million dollars per year. Do not forget that all these burdensome expenses are borne by the taxpayer through taxes.
2.- Let the courts be able to take care of the real crimes.
I refer to real interference against the freedom and property of third parties such as theft, fraud, or physical aggression since the act of using drugs does not threaten the freedom or property of others. We usually complain about the collapse of justice. Let's not contribute to this by judging crimes where there are none.
3.- Other civil liberties would be protected
In the so-called war on drugs, multiple civil liberties are thrown into the air on the road. Records, invasion of privacy, censorship and other associated prohibitions seem almost inevitable in an endless contest. Legalizing drugs seems an inescapable part of the restoration of many civil liberties that have been attacked.
4.- Drugs would be safer
It has come to be considered that the overwhelming majority of deaths from drug use are due to the lack of standardized doses, something that would naturally make the market open.
5.- The spread of diseases such as HIV would be contained
As D. R. Blackmon states in his book "Moral Deaths", the prohibition of drugs has contributed to the spread of HIV among intravenous drug users. Other diseases such as hepatitis also increase as a result of these drugs beyond any control of the legal market. Since drugs are prohibited, the sale of sterilized needles has been limited. Legalizing drugs, they would be safer and the sale of hygienic utensils would be freely allowed. The legalization of drugs in 2000 in Portugal has led to reduced HIV infection among drug users in this country to practically the European minimum.
6.- Organized crime would be eroded
When an asset is declared illegal, who is typically responsible for distributing it and offering it? As should be obvious, then those experts in skipping the law. Prices, in addition to prohibited goods or products, rise dramatically, partly due to the high costs of operating outside the law. Thus, with the prohibition we attract the experts in skipping the law with the extra appeal of huge benefits. Legalizing drugs, any person respectful of law and order could attend the open market of these goods and products. As Friedman said, the illegalization stimulates the cartelization of the drug market since it is not subject to free competition.
7.- Police corruption would be reduced
The illegalization of drugs generates exorbitant prices, which translate into very high benefits. Benefits that the law, through the prohibition, considers illegal. Police corruption is seriously aggravated in the current prohibitionist scenario, and with it the police themselves find an obstacle to more effectively combat assets that are impossible to eliminate in and of themselves.
8.- Many countries would be safer
There are regions and countries like Colombia, Nicaragua or others where the prohibition of drugs has wreaked havoc to the point of claiming many lives by terrorist organizations. The legalization of drugs would stop feeding those mafias and armed terrorist groups.
9.- Its consumption would be reduced
Although at first it might seem strange, the attractiveness effect that prohibition creates is in line with reality. For example, according to a study on drug addiction in Europe in 2009, the Dutch are among those who have the lowest rates of cannabis use despite being legalized in their country.
10.- Nature can not be prohibited
Prohibiting substances that exist in nature is ridiculous in that they will not cease to exist. The only way to know how to coexist with these substances is to legalize them, in the same way that alcohol could be seen as harmful to health, but its prohibition only leads (and has led to) all the consequences mentioned. Just as we know how to coexist with alcohol, we must know how to live with any other substance.