ALGUIEN PUEDE TRADUCIRME ESTO? SIN TRADUCTOR DE GOOGLE?
El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar los efectos del tipo de tipo de reforzador sobre el número de respuestas correctas en las relaciones de equivalencia en estudiantes, en la ciudad de Bogotá en una muestra de 20 mujeres y 21 hombres de la ciudad de Bogotá, con un rango de edad entre los 18 y 31 años. El diseño de este estudio en el primer grupo experimental es o-x-o y en el segundo grupo es o-x-o debido a la manera en la cual se presentó el reforzador. Se caracterizó por ser un estudio de tipo explicativo. Los resultados muestran que el número de respuestas correctas en la pruebas de flexibilidad, simetría y transitividad no depende del tipo de reforzador. Con lo anterior podemos concluir que existen diferencias significativas en la forma en la que el reforzador relaciona las equivalencias como un punto de aprendizaje condicionado, y que así mismo, cada reforzador y cada equivalencia formulan diferentes aprendizajes frente a diversas fases del experimento.
venus1908
No es de google The objective of this study was Sensory effects the Enhancer on the number of correct answers in the relations of equivalence in students, in the city of Bogota in a sample of 20 women and 21 men of the city of Bogotá, with a range of age between 18 and 31. The design of this study in the first experimental group is o - or and the second group is o - or because of the way in which arose the Enhancer. It is characterized by being an explanatory study. The results show the number of correct answers in the evidence of flexibility, symmetry and transitivity does not depend on the type of Enhancer. With the above we can conclude selection differences exist in the way in the Enhancer linked equivalencies as a conditioned learning point, and likewise, each booster and every equivalence formulated different learnings from different phases of the experiment.
The objective of this study was Sensory effects the Enhancer on the number of correct answers in the relations of equivalence in students, in the city of Bogota in a sample of 20 women and 21 men of the city of Bogotá, with a range of age between 18 and 31. The design of this study in the first experimental group is o - or and the second group is o - or because of the way in which arose the Enhancer. It is characterized by being an explanatory study. The results show the number of correct answers in the evidence of flexibility, symmetry and transitivity does not depend on the type of Enhancer. With the above we can conclude selection differences exist in the way in the Enhancer linked equivalencies as a conditioned learning point, and likewise, each booster and every equivalence formulated different learnings from different phases of the experiment.